§
Multifunctionality seeks to
acknowledge the “social role” of agriculture. Hence, focus on non-trade
concerns of agriculture.
§
Multifunctionality admits that beyond ensuring
food security, agriculture plays important role in supporting rural
development, maintenance of agricultural landscapes, cultural heritage,
preservation of agri-biological diversity and good
plant, animal and public health.
§
Government intervention is viewed as important to
support multifunctionality even where this
contradicts trade rules.
§
The agricultural sector is largely underdeveloped in
many d’g countries for domestic and export market.
Still, agriculture accounts for large share of GDP, employs large share of
labour force, major source of forex and subsistence
and income for large rural populations.
“ Significant progress in promoting economic growth, reducing poverty
and enhancing food security cannot be achieved in most of these countries
without developing more fully the potential capacity of the agricultural sector
and its contribution to overall economic development” (FAO, 1999).
§
Key sub-sectors need a multifunctional approach in
recognition of their far-reaching implications on peoples’ livelihood and
employment.
§
Multifunctionality should be geared
towards increasing domestic capacity, improving rural employment and
development.
§
§
Sub-sector has been marked by mismanagement
resulting in a drastic decline in production levels. In 1999 for instance, Mumias had a total production of 253,000 tonnes compared to
a total production of 191,000 produced by Chemelil,
§
§
The sugar sub-sector provides direct and regular
employment for 35,000 workers and thousands more employed as casual workers on
farms.
§
The sub-sector supports an estimated 2.6 million
people representing 7-8 % of the population.
§
As at beginning of 2000, 88% of total area of
108,793 hectares belonged to small-scale growers. Sub-sector strategic in
promoting rural development and fighting poverty.
§
Local outgrowers need protection against
unregulated sugar imports that glut market and stifle local production.
Potential interventions include classification of sugar as a designated
commodity, under-declaration and duty evasion by sugar importers. Allocation of
import quotas an important check against dumping and protection of revenue base
for local farmers.
§
Incentives should be targeted at enhanced efficiency
by reducing production costs and development of better varieties to enhance
competitiveness against low cost producers like
§
Wide variances exist on production costs. Mumias is the most efficient producer using 9.82 tonnes of
cane to make 1 tonne compared to 16.65 tonnes for Miwani.
In 1999, KSA estimated that the cost of developing a hectare of plant cane in Nzoia nucleus estate and outgrowers’
farms was Kshs 158,174 against a return of Kshs 138,400 to the farmer paid over 2-3 years.
§
But first, farmer has to pay: 18% VAT, 7% Sugar
Development Levy, 2% presumptive income tax, 1 % cess to local authorities and
additional levies to outgrower companies. In total, a
total tax burden in excess of 28%.
§
Incentives should support outgrowers
to sell without burdening consumers. Currently, taxation accounts for an
average 35% of the retail prices.
§
Prices of sugar should be determined by the
(international) market to ensure better returns to farmers as opposed to the
current structure where the price is negotiated between Kenya Sugar Cane
Growers Association, Kenya Sugar Manufacturers in consultation with Kenya Sugar
Authority.
§
There’s need to consider measures which can boost
efficiency in sub-sector e.g. irrigation and land reform in favour of
consolidation to reduce costs and enhance efficiency.
§
Need to consider how best to address dumping problem
with view to cushioning local producers. Current world production of 129.1
million tonnes in excess of annual consumption of 124.6 million tonnes creating
avenue for dumping.
§
Develop a “Development Box” under which developing
countries can increase domestic production and protect livelihoods of small
farmers.
§
DB to provide flexibility of import controls, tariff
barriers and domestic support for key agricultural products until export levels
are achieved.